All my thanks are due to Allah who enabled me to write this book, and may peace be upon all messengers of Allah. Among the common mistakes is that some people criticize the Divine law depending, only on the limited mental abilities of the humans in sensing things and comprehending them. Our means of hearing, seeing, smelling are so limited. Even with the use of technological extensions we are still short of recognizing countless things that we live with or among. Therefore, it is necessary to make use of two kinds of methods of authentication: textual and logical. The textual method depends primarily on the authenticity of the chains of narrators. In the case of the Holy Quraan and the Prophetic Traditions, the chain begins from the Prophet (pbuh) down to the person who put it in writing. Meanwhile, the logical methodology depends primarily on our human senses and reasoning faculty. When the information concerned is related to the Divine Will and commands, there is no alternative to the textual methodology. This is so because our human comprehension and reasoning fall short of passing judgment on Divine knowledge. For example, by reviewing the slow and tedious development of human discovery of the laws of nature that have existed since the creation of the universe, we will realize how limited our knowledge is. There are still endless things to be discovered by our limited tools and resources. Still among the other common mistakes is criticizing a part of a system neglecting the other parts. This mistake becomes more serious when it concerns the Divine law. An example of this is when some researchers discuss parts of an Islamic law stripped of their natural context, disregarding the other complementary parts. Those people are similar to a person who wonders Controversial Questions about Islam and Comments This Book presents a broad perspective of Islam: its sources, beliefs, rituals, laws and moral values, it also tries to answers the most frequently asked questions about Islamic teachings.